.png)
You’ve delivered the coaching session.
You’ve scored the call.
You’ve shared thoughtful, constructive feedback.
And still… nothing changes.
The same mistakes resurface.
The same agent nods politely—and does the opposite next week.
It’s not just frustrating. It’s demoralizing.
But here’s the truth:
CX agents aren’t ignoring feedback because they don’t care.
They’re ignoring it because the brain has defense systems, cognitive limits, and emotional filters that block change unless we coach with psychology in mind.
Let’s dig into the five reasons feedback fails—and what science says to do about it.
🛡️ 1. The Brain Resists Threats to the Self
When feedback feels like criticism, it activates the brain’s defense mechanisms—specifically the amygdala, which governs our fight-or-flight response.
Psychologist Daniel Goleman calls this an amygdala hijack: feedback becomes a perceived threat to identity, and the person shuts down or rationalizes rather than absorbs.
➡️ What to do instead:
Create psychological safety.
Refer to Amy Edmondson’s research: team members must feel safe to admit mistakes and discuss performance without fear of embarrassment or punishment.
- Normalize imperfection
- Frame feedback as learning, not failure
- Use "we" language instead of "you did this wrong"
Trust is the runway. Growth can’t take off without it.
🧩 2. Vague Feedback Doesn’t Stick
“Be more empathetic.”
“Improve your tone.”
“Try to own the call more.”
Feedback like this might sound useful—but to the brain, it’s meaningless.
According to Teresa Amabile (Harvard Business School), progress at work requires specific, actionable steps. Without clarity, the brain can’t form new mental models or habits.
➡️ What to do instead:
- Use real examples from actual calls
- Anchor feedback to observable behaviors
- Tie improvement to business or customer impact
For instance:
📞 “When the customer shared their frustration, you moved straight to the solution. Try acknowledging their feeling first—this can increase CSAT by 12%, according to our data.”
Precision fuels performance.
🧠 3. Cognitive Overload Sabotages Retention
The brain has a working memory limit. According to Miller’s Law, we can hold about 7 (plus or minus 2) items in mind at a time. Add stress or fatigue, and that number drops.
So when agents receive 6+ pieces of feedback at once, it’s not a coaching session—it’s a mental overload.
➡️ What to do instead:
- Focus on one skill or behavior at a time
- Space feedback across shorter, more frequent sessions
- Use micro-coaching embedded in the workflow
In psychology, this is called spaced learning—and it’s one of the most effective ways to build long-term behavior change.
⏳ 4. Timing Matters (A Lot)
Delayed feedback often feels disconnected from action.
As behavioral economist B.J. Fogg notes in his work on habit formation, feedback is most powerful when it’s tied to the behavior in real time—or as close to it as possible.
Why? Because the brain builds neural pathways by association. The shorter the gap between action and feedback, the stronger the imprint.
➡️ What to do instead:
- Deliver feedback as close to the moment as possible
- Use real-time nudges or post-call coaching tools
- Send short audio or text feedback right after a shift
Think real-time relevance, not retroactive reports.
💬 5. Top-Down Feedback Breeds Disengagement
Feedback is often treated as a one-way street.
But if agents don’t feel involved in their own development, motivation collapses.
Self-Determination Theory (Deci & Ryan) tells us that motivation thrives when people feel:
- Autonomy
- Competence
- Relatedness
Top-down critique threatens all three. Collaborative coaching enhances them.
➡️ What to do instead:
- Invite agents to self-reflect before offering feedback
- Co-create performance goals
- Ask questions like “What do you think worked well?” before offering your perspective
Feedback becomes a dialogue—not a download.
Final Thought: Feedback Is a System, Not a Soundbite
The neuroscience is clear.
The psychology is proven.
The performance data backs it up.
Agents ignore feedback not because they’re lazy—but because they’re human.
If we want lasting behavior change, we need systems built on empathy, clarity, and cognitive design.
At Leaptree, we’re helping CX leaders design those systems—where:
✅ Coaching is continuous
✅ Feedback is actionable
✅ Performance growth feels safe and motivating
Because the best QA programs aren’t just about what’s measured.
They’re about what’s learned—and how it makes people feel.
📚 References
- Goleman, D. (1995). Emotional Intelligence. Bantam Books.
- Edmondson, A. C. (1999). Psychological Safety and Learning Behavior in Work Teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(2), 350–383.
- Amabile, T. M., & Kramer, S. J. (2011). The Progress Principle: Using Small Wins to Ignite Joy, Engagement, and Creativity at Work. Harvard Business Review Press.
- Miller, G. A. (1956). The Magical Number Seven, Plus or Minus Two: Some Limits on Our Capacity for Processing Information. Psychological Review, 63(2), 81–97.
- Fogg, B. J. (2019). Tiny Habits: The Small Changes That Change Everything. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
- Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior. Springer Science & Business Media.